A Cloud-AI architecture for grassroots financial cooperatives
A case study of the credit department of an urban farmers' association, turning front-line pain points and knowledge loss into a system that combines electronic forms with RAG-based knowledge retrieval.
Cloud-AI Architecture for Grassroots Financial Cooperatives: Integrating Electronic Forms and RAG-Based Knowledge Retrieval
AICCC 2026 · Second author · Accepted, with an oral presentation in Tokyo this December
Background
Credit departments of farmers’ associations face a very practical problem. Senior staff are retiring, front-line headcount is shrinking, and a lot of operational knowledge lives only in those senior employees’ heads. When they leave, the knowledge leaves with them.
From our interviews we identified four front-line pain points:
- Not enough people: repetitive administrative work takes up too much staff time.
- Slow service: filling in forms, looking things up and confirming details all take time.
- Inconvenient service: work depends heavily on the counter process.
- Lack of standardisation: procedures and judgement are scattered across people and documents.
Research questions
- How can front-line pain points and knowledge loss be turned into concrete system modules and functions?
- How can electronic forms and RAG knowledge retrieval be integrated under one technical architecture, as a single service platform?
- How can an evaluation framework be established before the system goes live, as a basis for verifying its effect later?
System architecture
- Cloud application service: personal data entered by the user is merged into the PDF in the browser only, and is not sent to the server.
- AI and knowledge retrieval: dense and sparse retrieval run in parallel, results are fused with RRF and reranked with a cross-encoder, with extra weighting by regulation level.
- Security and access control: encrypted transport, authentication, role-based access, department and business scope, audit logs and sensitive data filtering.
An honest limitation
From a knowledge management point of view, the system does two things: it codifies knowledge into documents (codification), and it uses technology to lower the barrier to finding that knowledge (technology-enabled retrieval).
It does not do the third: passing experience from senior staff to newcomers (mentoring). An AI knowledge base can preserve knowledge that can be written down, but it cannot replace a senior employee’s judgement in a complicated situation. We state this clearly in the paper.
My part
I was responsible for the architecture of RAG, electronic forms, backend services, permissions and data flow, and took part in writing and revising the technical content of the paper.